Growth Potential Versus Current Capability
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ.
When the market is attractive, revenue is growing and the sales pipeline appears to support the plan, businesses are understandably keen to raise more capital to accelerate growth.
But there is a question I would want answered before committing that money.
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐๐ฒ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐๐ต?
Not just that the business can win customers. That it can do so repeatedly, economically and without every increase in revenue requiring a disproportionate increase in cost and management effort.
I’d want to understand:
โข How much of the pipeline actually converts into revenue?
โข Is sales productivity improving or deteriorating as the team grows?
โข Can the company win customers beyond the founder’s network and existing relationships?
โข Does the customer acquisition model still work in new markets?
โข Can the management team replicate success without relying on a handful of exceptional individuals?
None of these questions automatically means the business has a problem. But if the evidence isn’t there, the growth forecast may be describing the opportunity rather than the company’s ability to capture it.
That’s the distinction behind a framework I have recently developed: ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐๐ต ๐ฃ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐.
How attractive is the opportunity and most importantly, how capable is the business of converting that opportunity into sustainable growth?
For investors, I believe the gap between those two deserves far more attention.




